When Canada’s mass media stopped being Canadian
After more than 20 years of reporting on Canadian mass media outlets, this column is now in its final year, and has become a kind of endnote to the history of the industry in Canada.
We will see, for instance, the demise of the CBC, which closed its doors in the late 1990s and did not resume broadcasting until 2006, and the demise, with the exception of the occasional brief stint as the Voice of Canada, of some of the smaller media outlets that existed before.
We have also seen the consolidation of Canadian media into one giant corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, or CBC, and its increasingly diversified output.
There are also changes in the way that Canadian media is produced and consumed, including the shifting of much of the editorial and news reporting from one format to another.
In short, there has been a significant shift in how Canadians consume the media and the ways in which we engage with it.
While the mass media industry has been able to survive the transition to a digital era, it has been facing a series of challenges in this process.
There is a great deal of uncertainty about what, if anything, will be happening to the Canadian mass market and its coverage in the coming years.
One key issue is the extent to which mass media will be able to continue to operate as it has in the past, as the new mediums it produces and the new audiences it reaches will shift from a predominantly rural audience to an increasingly urban one.
While this shift is important for many Canadians, it is also very challenging for the mass industry.
To survive, it needs to keep up with a rapidly changing landscape of information, a rapidly shifting market and a rapidly growing audience.
A lot of the mass market content is made available online and on the Internet, and these technologies make it possible for many people to get access to this content without needing to buy a subscription to the mass-market television service or radio service.
Yet the mass business has always been an old-fashioned, traditional media company.
Mass media in Canada is a lot more digital than it was in the 1980s and 1990s, and a lot of that new digital-driven content is produced online.
As a result, there is a huge difference between the quality of mass media in the early 1990s that was produced by a single company and the quality that is produced by the mass of the country today.
That has meant a great difference in the coverage that Canadians get from mass media today, both from local news and from CBC and other national news services.
We are going to look at a number of different metrics to examine the performance of the Canadian media industry in the years since the fall of the Soviet Union.
First, we will look at the quality and diversity of the national mass media.
This is a measurement that includes both local and international content, and that includes news from local sources, but also from the largest metropolitan areas, including Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.
There have been several attempts in the last 20 years to measure the quality, and diversity, of the media in North America.
For instance, a 2004 report by the Organization of American States was the first to attempt to do so.
The report was called the Quality of Newspapers in North American Newspapers and published in 2009, and it included data from a variety of sources, including CBC, the National Post, the Montreal Gazette and the CBC.
The study identified two areas where the CBC had a significant lead over the rest of the public: Quebec and the West.
Quebec is a large, mostly rural province that produces a disproportionate share of its content through its CBC affiliates.
It also has a lot to gain from having access to all of the major Canadian media companies, including a large number of locally produced news services, and also a significant number of regional and national news networks.
There has been considerable controversy about the CBC’s quality in the wake of the 2011 Montreal terrorist attacks.
One of the key issues was whether the CBC produced its own content.
It did not.
The CBC’s own staff, in addition to those in the CBC newsroom, had access to the news from other sources, so there was no question that CBC’s content was often more comprehensive than the news on other networks.
For example, in 2006, for example, the CBC did a report on the deaths of three people in Montreal, including one of the three attackers, and included the death of a child.
But the CBC also produced a separate report on that story, and provided its own commentary on it.
The Quebecers found it quite interesting that the CBC was not reporting their own stories.
The fact that CBC had not done its own reporting, they said, was very surprising, and suggested that they may not have done their own reporting at all.
In 2011, the CRTC found that the quality is not very good in the national public service broadcaster category, which includes CBC, Radio-Canada and TVA. The CR