Why you shouldn’t listen to media framing

Why you shouldn’t listen to media framing

Mass media framing is a term that’s been around for decades and is generally used in media reports and commentary.

Its purpose is to emphasize a particular point of view over the whole of the story or message presented, while at the same time keeping the context of the message and the story itself relatively vague.

And that’s exactly what we’re seeing now.

Mass media is framing today, as it has for decades.

That’s what makes the word “framing” such a tricky one.

It can be used to describe a narrative in which a particular segment of the media is presented as the only ones who actually know what the story is or how to present it.

That might be because a specific segment of media is reporting the story as a fact, or as a conspiracy theory, or because a particular opinion is being expressed.

Whatever it is, framing is all about keeping the story vague and presenting the information in a way that makes the reader feel like they have a right to know what’s going on.

And we’re living in a times when that’s all too easy.

And yet, when it comes to the mainstream media, framing has always been a part of the equation.

The term is sometimes used in reference to what you might call the “fake news” narrative that has spread like wildfire in recent years.

A good example of this is the popular term “fake media” or “fake narratives.”

The idea is that the mainstream press and other media outlets are being very careful about reporting on a particular story, or that their coverage is being distorted or manipulated by the powerful.

But the reality is that we’re all living in an echo chamber, where we’re hearing exactly the same stories from the same sources over and over again.

And in order to be able to make sense of the stories we hear, we need a way to break through the echo chamber.

The answer is framing, and we’re already seeing it in practice.

Here’s how it works.

If you listen to the news on a regular basis, you’ll be exposed to a number of different types of stories.

But that doesn’t mean that all of these stories are really news.

There are stories that we all hear in our heads about everything from politics to sports, that don’t actually make it into the mainstream news.

These stories often make up a small part of what’s happening in the world today.

So the fact that we hear these stories in the news does not mean that we actually know anything about them.

This is where framing comes in.

It’s the way in which we create a false sense of familiarity.

We may hear stories that are very different in nature, but that we somehow have a natural grasp on how they work.

In the process of making sense of these false stories, we get to hear about things we didn’t even know existed, or about things that never happened.

The problem is that framing doesn’t always make sense.

The media framing that we’ve seen today is so common that it’s easy to forget that framing was originally a tool of the Enlightenment.

For example, if you were born in the 17th century, you likely heard about the “debate of religion,” which was about whether or not God existed.

There’s a reason for this.

After the Reformation, many people believed that the Bible was the word of God.

However, the debate never really stopped because, until the 1600s, it was considered taboo to debate the existence of God, even if it was proven to be true.

The fact that the debate was still being held was something that people couldn’t understand, but it wasn’t considered bad or even immoral.

The Enlightenment believed that people should not be afraid to question anything that they believed in, even when that questioning was wrong or immoral.

And so framing became a way for people to understand the different kinds of stories that people were telling about the world.

The first modern framing We can look back to the 1770s, when the term “framed narrative” first appeared in print.

This term referred to a narrative that the church, or the ruling elite, was presenting to the public.

The story that was presented was usually that of a violent, intolerant, or racist nation or group, and that the people in power were not doing enough to stop it.

In a nutshell, framed narratives are the stories that the media and government use to present to us the world as it actually is.

So framing today was an invention of the 16th and 17th centuries, when people were more comfortable with using their own language to describe the world than with talking about the things they knew about.

Today, framing can be found in a number to the extent that it involves a specific group of people.

It is, for example, common for politicians to present their political stances as fact.

This can be because politicians have a vested interest in the story that they’re presenting.

For some politicians, it’s a way of using their platform to get ahead in life. For others


Related Posts

How to make sure you don’t accidentally get caught in the net

How to make sure you don’t accidentally get caught in the net

How the mass media censored its own news

How the mass media censored its own news

What the Media Won’t Tell You About The Media’s Media Job Outlook

What the Media Won’t Tell You About The Media’s Media Job Outlook

FBI: ‘We have no evidence’ of ‘Russian hacking’

FBI: ‘We have no evidence’ of ‘Russian hacking’